Industry Insights
%201.avif)
The cargo insurance excess problem — and why most claims never get paid
You took out cargo insurance. Something went wrong. You made a claim.
Then you found out about the excess.
For thousands of Australian businesses every year, this is the moment freight insurance stops working the way they expected. Not because the insurer acted in bad faith. Not because the claim was invalid. Because the excess — the amount you pay before the insurer pays anything — was larger than the claim itself.
This article explains how cargo insurance excess works, why the traditional A$1,000–A$2,000 excess structure means the majority of real-world freight claims fall below the threshold, and what a no-excess alternative looks like.
An excess (sometimes called a deductible) is the portion of any claim that you absorb before the insurer contributes. It's standard in most insurance products — home, car, business.
In marine and cargo insurance, the excess is typically applied per claim, per consignment.
So if a policy has a A$1,500 excess and a claim is made for A$900 in damaged goods, the maths is straightforward: the payout is nil. The loss sits below the threshold.
If the claim is for A$2,000 in damaged goods, the payout is A$500. Cover was paid for. The claim was legitimate. The net recovery on a A$2,000 loss is A$500.
That's not a failure of the insurance system. That's the insurance system working exactly as it was designed to — for a different customer, with a different risk profile, than most Australian freight businesses.
Marine insurance was built for the shipping industry: large cargo movements, ocean freight, high-value goods crossing international borders. The excess structure reflects that heritage.
When a container of electronics worth A$200,000 is being insured, a A$2,000 excess is a rounding error. The policy is protecting against catastrophic loss. The excess filters out minor claims that would cost more to administer than they're worth.
It makes sense — for that use case.
The problem is that the same structure gets applied to domestic road freight for Australian businesses shipping everyday goods. And in that context, a A$1,000–A$2,000 excess doesn't filter out minor claims. It filters out most claims.
Freight damage in the SME and eCommerce world often looks like this:
All legitimate losses. All below or barely above a A$1,500 excess. All effectively unclaimable under a traditional marine-style policy.
This isn't unusual. It's the norm. A large share of freight claims in the domestic Australian market fall below the A$2,000 mark — which means, under traditional policies, many of those claims pay nothing.
Businesses that notice this stop relying on the policy for small losses. They absorb them as a cost of doing business. Over time, that silent absorption adds up — and there's no way to recover it.
Here's what makes the excess issue particularly frustrating.
Premium is paid for cargo insurance. That premium is calculated as a percentage of goods value — so the more that's shipped, the more it costs. Then, when something goes wrong, the loss has to clear the excess hurdle before the insurer contributes.
Protection has been paid for that can't be used on most real claims.
Some businesses respond by not claiming at all — they know the excess makes it pointless. Others claim anyway, only to find the payout is nominal.
Individual freight claims often feel small. A few hundred dollars here, a thousand there. For a business shipping frequently, those losses compound.
A business sending 200 consignments a month, at an average goods value of A$1,500, with a damage rate of 0.5% is looking at one damaged consignment per month. At A$750 average loss per incident, that's A$9,000 a year in absorbed losses — every cent of it below the excess threshold on a traditional policy.
At higher shipment volumes, or with goods of higher average value, the numbers escalate quickly.
Some freight insurance products — including those designed for the domestic Australian market — are structured with no excess. Cover applies from dollar one, on every consignment.
This changes the economics.
A A$400 damaged shipment is claimable. A A$150 lost parcel is claimable. The product addresses the claims that happen most often in day-to-day domestic freight — not just the catastrophic losses marine insurance was built for.
No-excess freight insurance is typically offered as embedded cover: built into the booking process with a freight carrier or logistics platform. Cover is selected when the shipment is booked. If something goes wrong, the claim goes through the provider — not a separate broker relationship with a marine insurer.
If you're looking at a cargo insurance policy, the excess clause is one of the most important things to check. It's usually in the policy wording.
What's worth looking for:
These terms aren't always disclosed prominently. They're in the fine print — worth reading directly.
Traditional marine insurance carries a typical excess of A$1,000–A$2,000 per claim, which means most small claims sit below the payout threshold. It's designed for high-value, infrequent cargo — arranged through a separate policy, priced as a percentage of cargo value, and broker-managed.
No-excess freight insurance has a A$0 excess. Every loss is claimable (subject to policy terms and limits). It's built for regular domestic freight — embedded at the point of booking, priced per consignment, and managed by the provider.
When a freight carrier offers transit protection or freight cover, two factual questions usually clarify the product:
The answers describe the product more clearly than most brochures.
A product with a A$1,000+ excess is likely a carrier-sponsored self-insurance scheme or a marine-style policy — a A$500 claim pays nothing. A product with no excess provides per-shipment cover from dollar one.

Industry Insights

Company News

Industry Insights