Industry Insights
When a carrier says no: what happens next, and what freight insurance changes
A shipment arrives damaged. Or doesn't arrive at all. You notify the carrier, lodge a claim — and the reply is partial, delayed, or a flat decline.
For a lot of Australian shippers, this is the first time they look closely at how carrier liability actually works. And it's usually not what they expected.
This article sets out, in plain English, what typically happens when a freight claim goes through a carrier — and what changes structurally when there's per-shipment transit insurance sitting behind the shipment instead.
Most Australian road freight and logistics operators contract on a "not a common carrier" basis. In practical terms, their liability for loss or damage is defined by their own terms and conditions, rather than by a default legal standard.
That structure matters. It means the answer to "what am I owed?" is almost entirely sitting inside a contract most shippers haven't re-read since they signed it.
Four things in a carrier's terms commonly shape the outcome of a claim:
Liability cap. Most carriers cap what they'll pay — per kilogram, per consignment, or per event. The cap is often well below the value of the goods.
Excluded goods categories. Fragile items, electronics, perishables, high-value items — many carriers either exclude these or apply reduced liability.
Notification timeframes. Typically 24 to 72 hours for visible damage, around seven days for concealed damage. Miss the window and the right to claim can be lost.
Dispute resolution process. How the carrier investigates its own claims, and what happens if the shipper disagrees.
None of this is hidden. It's in the T&Cs. But most shippers encounter it for the first time after something has already gone wrong.
When a carrier receives notification of damaged or lost goods, the standard process looks something like this:
They acknowledge the notification, provide their claims form and documentation list, assess the claim against their own terms, and eventually issue a written decision — paid, partially paid, or declined.
Practical experience often looks less tidy:
None of that means the carrier is acting unreasonably. It means the carrier is assessing its own handling error against its own terms — which is the structural problem at the heart of relying on carrier liability.
Carrier and insurance claims alike tend to be decided on documentation.
What typically supports a claim: photos of the damage from multiple angles (including the packaging), a POD or delivery receipt noting the damage before signing, the commercial invoice showing goods value, the consignment note, and written notification within the required timeframe.
What typically weakens one: signing "received in good condition" when goods are visibly damaged, disposing of damaged packaging before it's been inspected, missing the notification window, or having no invoice to substantiate value.
A common industry practice where damage isn't visible at the point of delivery is to note "received unchecked, subject to inspection" on the POD before signing — it records the position without requiring the shipper to prove fault at the door.
A decline isn't necessarily final, but the options narrow.
Most shippers ask for the reason in writing, compare it against the carrier's own terms, and use the carrier's internal escalation process. Where that doesn't resolve it, the external pathways in Australia include state Fair Trading bodies, the ACCC (for systemic issues rather than individual disputes), and small claims tribunals in each state and territory.
The honest read on external dispute resolution for freight: it's fragmented. Unlike insurance disputes — where the Australian Financial Complaints Authority offers a free, independent external dispute resolution service for eligible complainants, subject to AFCA's jurisdictional limits — there isn't an equivalent single body for carrier liability disputes. For claims in the low thousands, the time cost of pursuing formal dispute resolution often exceeds the value of the loss.
That's part of the context when weighing carrier liability against independent freight insurance.
For advice on a specific situation — rights under the Australian Consumer Law, contract interpretation, or dispute options — readers should seek their own legal advice.
For businesses shipping to end customers, there's a dynamic that catches people out.
The freight contract is between the business (as sender) and the carrier — so the claim rights against the carrier sit with the business, not with the end customer. The customer comes to the business first. And the business usually has to resolve that situation — refund, reship, replace — before the carrier claim is even determined.
The exposure compounds: the goods, the replacement cost to the customer, and the time cost of pursuing a carrier claim that may take weeks and pay partially, if at all.
This is why businesses shipping at volume tend to look at transit insurance — not because they expect things to go wrong more often, but because the cost of each failed delivery is higher than the goods value alone.
Per-shipment transit insurance changes the structure of the claims process at a few points:
Who assesses. The claim is assessed by an independent insurer, not by the carrier responsible for the goods.
Excess. FreightInsure has no excess on approved claims — cover applies from dollar one, subject to policy terms and exclusions set out in the PDS.
Timeframe. FreightInsure targets resolution of most claims within five business days, subject to receipt of required documentation and the specifics of each claim.
Limits. Cover applies up to FreightInsure's policy limits — AUD 100,000 per consignment domestically, AUD 50,000 per consignment internationally.
Freight insurance doesn't remove all exclusions — no insurance product does. Standard exclusions (including inadequate packaging and certain goods categories) apply, set out in the PDS. The structural difference is who assesses the claim, how quickly, and whether there's an excess sitting between the loss and the payout.
A short version:
Industry Insights
Company News
Industry Insights
